How much is that doggy in the window -- the one with the big giant tits? Looking as if she's about to be mounted by a plaster Ron Jeremy? Well, check out the link if you want to find out more, but here are a few excerpts from the gushing blurbs for this Pro Life Statue Of A Nude And Pregnant Britney Spears Down And Dirty Doggy Style --
Dedication of the life-sized statue celebrates the recent birth of Spears’ baby boy, Sean, and applauds her decision of placing family before career. “A superstar at Britney’s young age having a child is rare in today’s celebrity culture. This dedication honors Britney for the rarity of her choice and bravery of her decision,” said gallery co-director, Lincoln Capla. The dedication includes materials provided by Manhattan Right To Life Committee.
“Monument to Pro-Life: The Birth of Sean Preston,” believed Pro-Life’s first monument to the ‘act of giving birth,’ is purportedly an idealized depiction of Britney in delivery. Natural aspects of Spears’ pregnancy, like lactiferous breasts and protruding naval, compliment a posterior view that depicts widened hips for birthing and reveals the crowning of baby Sean’s head.
The monument also acknowledges the pop-diva’s pin-up past by showing Spears seductively posed on all fours atop a bearskin rug with back arched, pelvis thrust upward, as she clutches the bear’s ears with ‘water-retentive’ hands.
“Britney provides inspiration for those struggling with the ‘right choice’,” said artist Daniel Edwards, recipient of a 2005 Bartlebooth award from London’s The Art Newspaper. “She was number one with Google last year, with good reason --- people are inspired by the beauty of a pregnant woman,” said Edwards.
“Monument to Pro-Life” is on view April 7th thru 23rd with a reception for the dedication April 7th from 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm at Capla Kesting Fine Art, 121 Roebling St., Brooklyn, NY. Gallery hours are 1:00 – 6:00 pm Thursday thru Sunday, or by appointment. The gallery can be reached at www.caplakesting.com or by phone at 646-932-5687
See, we all know that the difference between 'porn' and 'art' is entirely subjective, and I myself have long known that 'smut', like 'family values', 'decency', 'sedition', and 'All American', means pretty much whatever you're pointing towards at the time you say it. Rarely, however, do I see this concept of subjectivity embodied more clearly than this. What is it that makes this art instead of porn? Is it that it's a sculpture, rather than a photo or a drawing? What if it was an oil painting? A watercolor? Would it make a difference if we knew the sculptor did the entire project one handed, from concept sketches through finished statue? Can it be that all that matters is the media -- that the form of the image is all it takes to place or remove an in from the front of decency?
I suspect this is just a case of spin -- the gallery in question knows that a nude statue of Britney Spears is going to be a pretty good draw, but they don't want people to think they're running a hooch show, even a ceramic one, and they certainly don't want folks to regard them as the plaster equivalent of a Niagara Falls wax museum -- an a pretty strongly R rated one, at that. (Say, there's an idea -- an adult wax museum with X rated dioramas. I wonder what kind of zoning you need for that...)
Still, I don't know. A nude Britney Spears down on all fours on a bearskin rug... smells like porn to me. Not that there's anything wrong with that...
<---is stunned speechless, at least for now. pseudo-Christian hypocrisy isn't normally this open.
ReplyDeleteWasn't everyone having this same discussion about Madonna about ten years ago?
ReplyDeleteI think it's pretty stupid, myself. Why can't she just pose for Playboy or slip an anonymous video on the web, like everybody else?
Uggggghhhh!!!!! I've seen women in childbirth and never have they carressed a bears ears--or anything else for that matter. The litany goes-"get it out, get it out, get it out!" Along with any position that works--but never "doggy style."
ReplyDelete